Singapore to Impose World’s First Green Fuel Levy, Adding $3–$12 to Air Tickets

Key Highlights–
- Singapore to introduce a sustainable aviation fuel levy from 2026
- Economy passengers to pay $1–$10.40 depending on route distance
- Move sparks debate on whether other countries will follow
Singapore will impose a sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) levy of up to S$41.60 ($31) per passenger starting next year, a landmark policy aimed at reducing emissions in the aviation sector.
Singapore’s $10 Green Fee: A First in Global Aviation
According to the Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore (CAAS), the green fuel levy will apply to tickets sold from April 1, 2026, for flights departing the country from October 1, 2026. Passengers merely transiting through Singapore will not be charged.
The city-state will become the first in the world to implement such a centralized green fuel fee, marking a critical step in aligning its aviation goals with global climate commitments.
How the Green Fuel Levy Works
Under the new system, the amount passengers pay will depend on travel distance and class. Economy and premium economy travelers will pay around S$1 ($0.74) for flights within Southeast Asia and S$10.40 ($7.60) for long-haul trips to the Americas.
Business and first-class passengers will pay four times that amount, while cargo flights will also be taxed, with the levy calculated based on aircraft weight.
Funds raised through the levy will go toward a centralized pool for purchasing sustainable aviation fuel, which is typically produced from waste oils, animal fats, and agricultural residues.
CAAS said in its statement that lower global fuel costs have helped the government keep the surcharge below earlier estimates of S$3 to S$16, as reported by The Straits Times.
A Push Toward Sustainable Skies
Sustainable aviation fuel is widely considered the most immediate path to cutting airline emissions, offering up to 80% lower carbon output compared to conventional jet fuel. However, its high cost, which is often two to four times more expensive, has slowed global adoption.
By introducing a national framework to pool SAF purchases, Singapore aims to reduce cost barriers for airlines operating from its airport. The country has set a target of 3% to 5% SAF adoption by 2030, positioning itself as a regional leader in green aviation policy.
The initiative aligns with Singapore’s broader Green Plan 2030, which promotes low-carbon energy transition and sustainable transport across sectors.
Will Other Countries Follow?
The global aviation industry has pledged to reach net-zero emissions by 2050, but few governments have introduced direct passenger levies to fund the transition.
Analysts believe Singapore’s move could set a precedent, prompting other major hubs, such as Dubai, London, and Frankfurt, to consider similar surcharges.
Aviation researcher Dr. Suresh Nair told CNA that “Singapore’s small size and policy agility make it an ideal test bed. If this model proves effective, others will copy it within five years.”
Still, airlines remain cautious. Industry groups warn that additional costs could hurt travel demand, especially as airfares have already surged post-pandemic.
The Bigger Picture
As nations race to decarbonize aviation, Singapore’s move signals a turning point in how governments approach climate accountability within one of the world’s most carbon-intensive industries. Instead of relying solely on airline pledges or complex offset schemes, the city-state is using pricing as a behavioral tool, shifting some responsibility to consumers while creating a clear funding pipeline for greener fuels.
By pooling the funds to invest in sustainable aviation fuel (SAF), Singapore is effectively building a long-term market for clean energy in air travel, setting a practical example that others can emulate.
If the plan unfolds smoothly in 2026, it could redefine global aviation policy, demonstrating that sustainability and competitiveness can coexist. The initiative may also influence how airports, carriers, and regulators around the world rethink their own emissions strategies.
The real question now: Will a $10 green fee truly change how we fly, and will the rest of the world follow suit?



